A working book with one uncapped loss in it

You are up $198.03 across 21 trades with a profit factor of 2.82, and that is a real result, not luck dressed up. But a single BTC long accounts for 99.4% of everything you have ever lost, and nothing in your history suggests you have a mechanism to stop the next one.

Net P/L
$198.03
Profit factor
2.82
Win rate
95.2%
Worst trade
-$108.61

One trade is your entire loss column

You have taken one loss across the whole history, and it is bigger than any seven of your wins combined. The single BTC long on 2026-03-18 cost -$108.61 on $138.85 committed — a -78.2% round trip — and it accounts for 99.4% of every dollar you have ever lost. Strip the two worst results and the book reads $306.01 instead of $198.03.

That is not a losing account. It is a profitable account carrying one uncapped tail. Your average winner is $15.33; your average loser is $108.61. The asymmetry runs the wrong way, and only a very high hit rate is hiding it.

OpenedMarketInOutP/LReturn
2026-03-18BTC long$138.85$30.24-$108.61-78.2%
2026-07-29SOL long$250.17$250.80$0.630.3%
2026-03-22BTC long$24.48$25.25$0.773.1%
2026-07-28JTO long$58.57$59.69$1.121.9%
2026-03-22BTC long$46.09$47.34$1.252.7%

The edge is real and it is not an accident

Everything in the pack points to a working process. Over 21 closed trades you are 95.2% winners with a profit factor of 2.82 and expectancy of $9.43 per trade. Median return per trade is 3.3% on a median size of $225.79.

No liquidations: 0, with $0.00 of capital lost to forced closes. Size discipline is real too — you keep almost everything in one band, and that band is where the money is: 16 trades for $185.11.

Holding longer helps. Trades held one to three days produced $99.56 and those held beyond three days $52.29, while the one-to-six-hour bucket is the only negative window at -$14.16.

OpenedMarketInOutP/LReturn
2026-07-28LIT long$221.41$292.71$71.3032.2%
2026-08-08VVV long$261.81$307.01$45.2017.3%
2026-07-30ZEC long$252.06$295.36$43.3017.2%
2026-08-10MET long$400.00$437.87$37.879.5%
2026-08-14LIT long$329.75$362.05$32.309.8%

The damage did not come from adding to losers

You are not a martingale trader. 19 of your positions are single-leg entries producing $159.04, and you added into a drawdown exactly twice — once between two and five percent down for $37.87, once past ten percent down for $1.12. Neither add lost money.

The failure mode here is not averaging down. It is the absence of a stop. The worst trade ran to -78.2% in 0.10 of a day on a single leg — there was no scaling, just no exit.

single_leg
$159.04
19 trades
added_in_profit
$0.00
0 trades
added_0_to_2_down
$0.00
0 trades
added_2_to_5_down
$37.87
1 trade
added_5_to_10_down
$0.00
0 trades
added_past_10_down
$1.12
1 trade

Recent months are the good months

The account has three active months and they tell a clean story. The first month, spanning 2026-03-15 onward, was the BTC month and it closed underwater. The two most recent months put up back-to-back gains and dragged cumulative P/L to $198.03 by 2026-08-15.

The improvement coincides with a change in what you trade. Your only losing asset is BTC; the alt longs — the assets carrying your best result of $71.30 on LIT at 32.2% — are all clean.

2026-03$198.03 cumulative2026-08

Long-only, in one direction, in one regime

Every trade in the book is a long: 21 of 21, for $198.03. That is an untested directional bias, and the sample spans a period where it worked. You have no evidence about how this process behaves when the tape stops cooperating.

Read that alongside the loss column. A single adverse gap already cost you -$108.61. A directional book with no short expression and no hard exit is one bad week from giving back the entire $306.64 of gross profit.

Scorecard

66/ 100
Adaptation7/10

You stopped trading the asset that lost you money and the two most recent months are both profitable, ending at $198.03 cumulative.

Discipline6/10

No liquidations at 0, almost no averaging down, and consistent sizing — but the -78.2% loss shows there is no exit rule.

Edge7/10

Profit factor of 2.82 and expectancy of $9.43 across 21 trades, though a single regime and a single direction limit confidence.

Risk control3/10

One trade produced 99.4% of all losses at -78.2% of capital committed — there is no loss ceiling in this book.

Sizing8/10

Median size of $225.79 is consistent and the 16-trade core band earned $185.11; sizing never caused the damage.

Edge and sizing are doing the work here, so they carry most of the weight and the score is comfortably positive. Risk is weighted heavily too because the one uncapped loss is the only thing standing between this book and a much better one — $306.01 without it.

Put a stop on every entry this week — your loss column is one uncapped trade

  • 1.Set a hard per-trade stop at a fixed fraction of position size and configure it at entry, before the trade is live. Your median size is $225.79 and your average winner is $15.33; a stop anywhere near one average-winner's worth of loss would have turned the BTC disaster from -$108.61 into a rounding error and left the rest of the book untouched.
  • 2.Second, act on what the hold-time data already tells you: the 6 trades held one to six hours are your only losing bucket at -$14.16. Either give positions room to reach the one-to-three-day window that produced $99.56, or cut them inside the hour where you are $25.20. The middle is where you bleed.

This is a small sample — 21 trades, one loss — so the profit factor of 2.82 is not yet a proven edge. A loss cap protects the edge you may have; it does not confirm it.

Computed from 21 closed trades between 2026-03-15 and 2026-08-15. Every figure is calculated from your own cash flows; the write-up is generated from those figures and never computes its own.
Engine v1 · schema v1 · generated 8/22/2026, 12:40:45 AM
This is an analysis of past trades, not financial advice.

Imperial scores every trader's history the same way.

Get your own report